For communications teams, the media list remains one of the most familiar tools in earned media. The process is well established: identify the relevant journalists, develop the story, send the pitch and follow up. It is a practical approach that continues to have value, particularly when communications professionals have built trusted relationships with journalists who understand their organisations and sectors.
But the media environment has changed considerably while the basic mechanics of information exchange between organisations and journalists have changed much less. Organisations now generate an enormous amount of information that could be useful to the media, from original research and proprietary data to executive expertise, industry analysis, reports and insights from their operations. At the same time, journalists are working across increasingly specialised beats and under significant time pressure, often needing credible information and relevant sources quickly
The challenge, therefore, is not simply that organisations have difficulty getting their stories published or that journalists receive too many pitches. There is a broader information gap between the two sides: valuable information exists, journalists may need it, but the two do not always have an effective way of finding each other at the moment that information becomes relevant.
The Limits of a Pitch-led Approach
The traditional pitch-led model depends heavily on the communications professional making the right connection before the journalist knows they need the information. A communications professional has to decide which journalists are likely to be interested in a particular story, usually based on their previous coverage, their beat, existing relationships or information from a media database. For a major announcement, that approach is often entirely appropriate.
The difficulty becomes more apparent when the information an organisation has does not look like a conventional media story. A company may have conducted research into changing consumer behaviour, an executive may have expertise relevant to an emerging policy debate, or a business may have data that helps explain a developing market trend. These resources can be genuinely useful to journalists without being obvious subjects for a traditional press release.
This creates a problem of timing and visibility. The communications team may not know that a particular journalist is researching the subject, while the journalist may have no reason to know that the organisation possesses relevant information. Both sides can therefore miss an opportunity without either having done anything particularly wrong.
The Media Value of an Oganisation Extends beyond its Announcements
For organisations seeking sustained media relevance, this distinction is important because their potential contribution to journalism is usually much broader than the announcements they actively want covered. A business does not only produce news when it launches a product, signs a partnership or reaches a milestone. It also accumulates knowledge, data, expertise and experience that can help explain what is happening within its industry.
That information can take many forms. It can include research reports and original findings, industry data and analysis, company developments, expert commentary, thought leadership, case studies, technical knowledge, interviews and access to people with specialist expertise. The value of these resources is not necessarily that they promote the organisation; it is that they can provide evidence, context or a credible source for a journalist developing a story.
This changes the question communications professionals should ask when considering their media strategy. Instead of looking only at what the organisation wants to announce, it is worth asking what the organisation knows, what it can substantiate and what it can contribute to conversations that journalists are already covering.
That is a more useful way to think about earned media because it places the organisation’s knowledge within the wider information ecosystem rather than treating every media interaction as a request for coverage.
Journalists Face a Discovery Challenge of Their Own
The information gap is not only an organisational problem. Journalists also operate within systems that naturally favour existing relationships and familiar sources. When working to a deadline, there is an obvious advantage in contacting someone whose expertise is already known, whose information has proved reliable and who can respond quickly.
Those relationships are an essential part of journalism, but they also have natural limits. Every journalist has a finite professional network, and there will always be experts they have not yet encountered, organisations whose work they are unaware of and research that has not reached their attention. A journalist investigating a particular market may not know that a company outside their existing network has recently produced relevant data. A reporter covering technology may be looking for a specialist perspective without knowing where to find one.
The opportunity is not to replace the relationships journalists have built. It is to create additional ways for relevant information and credible sources to become visible beyond those existing networks.
Relevance Matters More than the Size of the Media List
This also calls into question one of the more traditional measures of media outreach: volume. A large media list can demonstrate extensive distribution, but the number of people who receive a pitch says little about whether the information was relevant to them.
For journalists, a smaller number of useful, well-targeted opportunities can be more valuable than a constant stream of broadly distributed announcements. For organisations, reaching journalists who genuinely cover the subject matter can create stronger opportunities than repeatedly sending information to a large number of contacts with only a loose connection to the story.
The more useful measure is therefore not simply how many journalists received the information, but whether the information reached people for whom it had genuine relevance.
This is where technology has an opportunity to improve the process, not by replacing the judgement and relationships that underpin good media relations, but by making relevant information easier to discover.
What Changes when Information Becomes Discoverable?
This is the thinking behind Predge. The platform is designed around a simple observation: organisations have information that journalists may find useful, while journalists are continually looking for information relevant to the stories they are developing. The challenge is creating a more direct way for those two needs to meet.
Rather than making a pitch the only route through which an organisation’s information reaches the media, Predge provides a structured environment where organisations can make their information available for discovery. Organisations can share research, reports, industry data, company developments, expert perspectives, thought leadership and interview opportunities alongside more conventional announcements.
Journalists can then discover information relevant to their areas of coverage, review the available context and determine whether it has editorial value for the work they are doing. If they need additional information or want to explore the subject further, they can engage directly with the organisation or source.
The role of the journalist does not change in this process. Predge does not determine whether something is newsworthy, guarantee coverage or influence the editorial decision. The journalist decides whether information is relevant, whether it warrants further investigation and whether it ultimately becomes a story.
What changes is the path by which useful information can be found.
A Broader Role for Communications Professionals
This approach also reflects a broader shift already taking place within the communications profession. Media relations increasingly requires communications teams to understand not only what their organisations want to say, but also what knowledge and expertise they can contribute to the wider conversations taking place around their industries.
That requires a deeper understanding of the organisation itself. The communications team may know which executive can provide perspective on a market shift, which department holds useful data, which research has implications beyond the organisation or which subject-matter expert can help explain a complex development. The opportunity is to make those resources available in ways that are useful to journalists without turning every interaction into a promotional exercise.
For experienced communications professionals, this is less about abandoning established media-relations practice and more about expanding it. Strong journalist relationships, thoughtful pitching and good editorial judgement remain essential. But they can be complemented by systems that allow useful information to be discovered even when the organisation and journalist do not already know each other.
Technology Should Strengthen, not Replace, Relationships
There is a tendency to frame technology in media relations as a replacement for the human relationships that have traditionally driven earned media. That is the wrong distinction.
Trust still matters. Accuracy still matters. Editorial judgement still matters. A communications professional who understands a journalist’s work and provides relevant information will always have an advantage over someone who sends indiscriminately. Likewise, journalists will continue to rely on sources they know to be credible.
Technology is most useful when it addresses the gaps around those relationships. It can help surface information that might otherwise remain invisible, make relevant sources easier to discover and create a more structured way for organisations and journalists to connect when there is a genuine reason to do so.
The objective is not to make media relations less human. It is to make the information exchange surrounding those relationships more useful.
From Media Outreach to Media Discovery
The evolution of earned media is therefore unlikely to be about simply increasing the volume of pitches. The more meaningful opportunity lies in improving how information is discovered and how relevance is established between organisations and journalists.
For organisations, that means recognising that their media value extends beyond announcements and includes the research, data, expertise and knowledge they can contribute. For journalists, it means having more ways to discover credible information and sources outside their existing networks. For communications professionals, it means combining the relationship-driven discipline of traditional media relations with better systems for making useful information visible.
That is the space Predge is built to explore.
Earned media has always depended on an exchange between organisations with something useful to say and journalists deciding whether that information is worth sharing with their audiences. The opportunity now is to make it easier for that information to be discovered in the first place.
Welcome to a new era of Media Relations. Join Predge today.
Leave a Reply